Peer Review Process

All manuscripts submitted to *An-Nahdliyyah: Journal of Islamic Studies* must adhere to the journal’s focus, scope, and author guidelines. Submitted manuscripts must address scientific merit or novelty that aligns with the journal’s focus and scope. All authors are advised to use plagiarism detection software to check for similarities. The editorial board checks for plagiarism in articles in this journal using Plagiarism Checker software. The plagiarism tolerance level for this journal is 35%.

Research articles submitted to this journal will be reviewed by at least 2 (two) or more expert reviewers. Articles will be sent to peer reviewers for a double-blind peer review process and will be returned to the authors for revision. Reviewers provide valuable scientific comments to improve the content of the manuscript. All manuscripts are subject to peer review, and authors can expect a decision—or an explanation for any delay—within two months of submission. Authors must submit revised manuscripts within two weeks if revisions are requested. The Editor-in-Chief makes the final decision based on information obtained through the peer-review process.

As outlined in our publication ethics guidelines, we ensure that reviewed manuscripts are treated confidentially prior to publication.

The final decision on article acceptance will be made by the Editor in accordance with the reviewers’ comments. The publication of accepted articles—including the order in which they are published—will be determined by the Editor-in-Chief, taking into account the order of receipt, the authors’ geographic distribution, and thematic issues.